MMA Handicapper Stats: Cian Coggins |
|
|
Cian Coggins: Event by Event Predictions |
The straight picks, parlays and props sections display Winnings / Bets (ROI%)
Winning Events: 1 (25%)
Losing Events: 3 (75%)
Average Staked Per Event: 7.50 units
Most Staked On One Event: 10.00 units
Best Event: 16.90 units
Worst Event: -10.00 units
Average Event: -0.78 units
Max Win Streak: Events: 1, Units: 16.90
Max Losing Streak: Events: 3, Units: -20.00 |
Cian Coggins: Year on Year Profit |
| Year |
Bet |
Won |
ROI |
Straight
Won / Bet (ROI%) |
Prop
Won / Bet (ROI%) |
Parlay
Won / Bet (ROI%) |
Events
Won / Lost
(%) |
Profit
Per Event |
| 2017 |
30 |
-3.1 |
-10% |
|
|
-3.1 / 30 (-10%) |
1 / 3 (25%) |
-0.78 |
|
Cian Coggins: Yearly Straight Pick Stats |
|
To view these stats, you need to be a VIP
|
Cian Coggins: Profit / Loss by Organization |
| Organization |
Bet |
Won |
ROI |
Straight Picks |
Props |
Parlays |
|
UFC |
25 |
1.9 |
8% |
|
|
1.9 / 25 (8%) |
|
Bellator |
5 |
-5.0 |
-100% |
|
|
-5.0 / 5 (-100%) |
|
Cian Coggins: Straight Pick Stats |
Big favourite means >65% win chance according to bookies. Big underdog is <35% chance.
| |
Picks |
Correct |
% Correct |
Units Bet |
Units Profit |
Profit per Pick |
ROI |
| Big Favorites |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
| Slight Favorites |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
| Slight Underdogs |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
| Big Underdogs |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
Betting Stats By Card Position
| |
Picks |
Correct |
% Correct |
Units Bet |
Units Profit |
Profit per Pick |
ROI |
| Main Event |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
| Co-Main Event |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
| Position 3-5 |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
| 6+ (Undercard) |
0 (nan%) |
0 |
nan % |
0.00 |
0.00 |
nan |
nan% |
|
Cian Coggins: Profit by Weight Class |
| |
Picks |
Correct |
% Correct |
Units Bet |
Units Profit |
Profit per Pick |
ROI |
|
Props & Parlay Section Stats (Individual sections of this handicapper's parlays) |
Straight picks within parlays
| |
Picks |
Correct |
% Correct |
| Big Favorites |
4 (44%) |
4 |
100 % |
| Slight Favorites |
3 (33%) |
1 |
33 % |
| Slight Underdogs |
2 (22%) |
0 |
0 % |
| Big Underdogs |
0 (0%) |
0 |
nan % |
|
9 |
5 |
56 % |
Props bets and props within parlays
| |
Picks |
Correct |
% Correct |
| >65% chance |
2 (50%) |
2 |
100 % |
| 50-65% |
0 (0%) |
0 |
nan % |
| 35-50% |
2 (50%) |
0 |
0 % |
| <35% chance |
0 (0%) |
0 |
nan % |
|
4 |
2 |
50 % |
|
Prop Bets and Props within Parlays: Bet Types |
| Prop Type |
Picks |
Correct |
% Correct |
Avg
Odds |
Longest
Odds |
Shortest
Odds |
1U Bet (ROI %) |
| Over (e.g. 1.5 / 2.5 rnds) |
4 (100%) |
2 |
50 % |
1.77 |
2.50 |
1.38 |
-1.2 (-31%) |
|
4 |
2 |
50 % |
1.77 |
|
|
-1.2 (-31%) |
* 1U Bet (ROI %): Many of the picks will have been part of a parlay, however, as a rough guide to value / profitability, this figure supposes that the handicapper put a 1U bet on each of the picks individually, showing the profit / loss they would have made and the ROI %. |
Tail Cian Coggins's bets |
If you had tailed this handicapper's bets since they started logging their picks with us, it would have affected your betting bank balance as follows...
This is more accurate than simply X units total profit. Under that more basic system, 1 unit is equal to the same amount of theoretical dollars, whether it was the last event or 10 events ago. However, if a handicapper has 10 events profit in a row, their betting bank balance will be significantly larger for the 10th event and 1 unit will equal a LOT more than it did 10 events ago.
ROI % from starting bank balance: -5.05% (including fees)
*Note - we don't store historical fee amounts, so we assume the fees are the same as the handicapper charges now. |
Cian Coggins: Last 20 Wins / Losses (Straight Picks) |
Last 20 Wins
| |
Date |
Straight Pick |
Opponent |
Odds |
Bet |
Result |
|
|
Last 20 Losses
| |
Date |
Straight Pick |
Opponent |
Odds |
Bet |
Result |
Hedge? |
|
|
* Hedge indicates that this handicapper also had a WINNING bet on the opponent. For example, they may have bet A to win straight up but with a hedge on the other fighter winning by decision. |
Cian Coggins: Progress Chart |
|
